Thursday, November 13, 2008

The new Washington/Media math: 1/100 is greater than 1/50


The entire content of this post could be moot if, as is usually the case, the Republicans lose yet another closely contested vote count. Why is it the Democrats always seem to gain votes in these? I guess though it doesn't matter, if the Democrats lose, the votes just get counted again, and again and again until the Democratic candidate wins.

Governor Sarah Palin continues to develop as a leader in the GOP. Some are talking about her as a potential replacement for convicted pork farmer Ted Stevens. They say the Senate would expose her nationally and set her up for a potential Presidential run of her own in 2012.

Why the hell would she want to do that? Why give up the kush job of the babe in charge of one large piece of real estate with excellent views to move to the perennial murder capital of the United States to hang out with the slime of society that represents our nationally elected officials?

Face it, being associated with governors like this guy, this guy or this guy seems like much better company than this circus of self-serving freaks!

As governor she is the chief executive and has direct decision making duties and accountability for her actions. As one of 100 Senators she would be a face in the crowd. Senators are looked down on more than the President!

If she truly is considering a run in 2012, she'd be better coming to the race as a governor. Barack Obama is the first senator to be directly elected to the office of President since JFK. (True, Ford was in Congress but his position immediately prior to President was Vice President. Hence he never ran for President while holding an office in the Congress). Most President's, and the more successful ones were Governors.

If Mrs. Palin goes to Washington, am afraid she'll become infected with the same disease that befalls many in that town: Self-servus porkitis.

S2

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

You can't raise a bottle baby when there are so many boobs around?

The act of a mother feeding her baby in a natural way is a beautiful thing. Ok ok, we men are pigs and look only for the opportunity to see an errant nipple! But yes, it is a natural and healthy activity that, according to experts, is beneficial for the child.

There comes a time in every rearing where the baby needs to be weaned. Unfortunately some babies refuse to give up the teat and cry and cry and cry when denied.

The mother needs to just say:

Stop it!

Stop it!

Stop it! It is time for you to go out on your own and make your own way.

It is unnatural for the baby, after years of self-sufficiency to return to the mom and demands access to the teat in some Oedipus-like need for support.

Right now our government is exposing itself to new sucklers faster than Selma Hayek to a newborn baby.

The more the United States nurses its citizenry and businesses, the more will want access to the nipple of public funds. Just like a woman can produce a finite amount of milk, so too our country can only maintain a finite amount of spending. Our treasury is printing money at an unprecedented rate. We can not continue to do this. A mother can not protect her child from self-destruction. Nor can a government say an industry is too big to fail. We must let them.

Oedipus was a freak. Then again, the government is NOT our mother. The “mother’s” are those in Congress who insist on taking us down the road to socialism and government ownership/involvement in the private sector. Capitalism will work (an idea I will expand on in a soon to come post) if we can keep the boobs in charge firmly held in the bra of limited government and political restraint. When the baby cries, it takes a strong parent to ignore it. We don't have a strong parent in our current crop of elected officials. Their ability to lead or understand capitalism is about as natural as Pamela Anderson's most famous attributes. Call your congressman, call your senator, call Hanes, we need to make our government aware that we demand the weaning of society.

S2

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

Foul Mouthed Rocker Ozzie Ozbourne was f*&king Prescient

F$%king Ozzie Osbourne, formerly of the constantly bleeped f%$king reality show the Osbournes, seemed to predict the G$d d$%med future with his 1980 song Crazy Train. The f$%ker hit the s&*t right on the head with lyrics that f$%king mirror the s%^t we are going through today!

This is a link fest. Follow the f$#king blue lined links and see just how G#d d$#%ed ahead of his time f%$king Ozzie was! Links should open in a new window.


Crazy train lyrics:

All aboard

Crazy, but that's how it goes
Millions of people living as foes
Maybe it's not too late
To learn how to love
And forget how to hate

Mental wounds not healing
Drivin' me insane
I'm going off the rails on a crazy train
I'm going off the rails on a crazy train

I've listened to preachers
I've listened to fools
I've watched all the dropouts
Who make their own rules

One person conditioned to rule and control
The media sells it and you live the role

Mental wounds still screaming
Driving me insane
I'm going off the rails on a crazy train
I'm going off the rails on a crazy train

I know that things are going wrong for me
You gotta listen to my words
Yeah

Heirs of a cold war
That's what we've become
Inheriting troubles I'm mentally numb
Crazy, I just cannot bear
I'm living with something' that just isn't fair

Mental wounds not healing
Who and what's to blame
I'm going off the rails on a crazy train
I'm going off the rails on a crazy train

End of song.


It would be funny if it wasn’t all too true. Who knew a simple rock and roll song could have such meaning 28 years after its first release? One prediction I feel fairly certain about is that in another 28 years, the Rap music of today will still…….. Suck!


S2